No, I’ve not moved, I’ve just managed to get moving again.
I had to stop exercising when I was laid low by the dreaded porcine lurgy. It is very dangerous to exercise when you have a virus, as it puts too great a load on the heart.
I had been very good up to that point. I’m not able to do a great deal when it comes to physical activity as the MS tends to jump up and bite me at inopportune moments – like my legs failing somewhere away from home if I go walking, just as a f’rinstance.
One thing I have always done is light handweights and I am quite muscular in my upper body, though not bulky. This has caused me insurmountable grief when shopping for clothes in the USA as it appears that American women don’t have biceps. Of any kind. Apparently. I have to buy shirts several sizes larger than I need, just to get them to fit around my arms. Sigh.
Anyway, I couldn’t bring my weights with me – can you imagine the excess luggage costs? – and I needed to do something before I turned to flab. So, I used the old noggin and went to Walmart. There was no way I was spending money on weights while I was here, so I bought two 1.2 litre drink flasks with handles on them instead.

My makeshift handweights.
One litre of water weighs one kilogram. So, I started off doing my routine with 500ml and worked my way up as I got back into form. The bottles are a little bulky, but I can hold them by the handles and they cost me $1.40 each. I’d just gotten to the two sets of reps stage when I got sick.
So, I started again yesterday with only one set – it almost killed me. I couldn’t believe how hard it was! Man!! No ill effects today though.
I have been wanting to do some more aerobic-type exercise. The treatment for an MS attack is large quantities of IV corticosteroids, which cause the body to retain fluid and create abdominal fat; both of which are incredibly hard to shift and cumulative. I’m thoroughly sick of both of them and want to get something resembling my own body back.
At home I have a stationary bicycle, but I’m unwilling to pay to join a gym here to use one of theirs. I considered going walking around the neighbourhood, but the fear of getting away from the hotel and being unable to get back is a major deterrent. The heat outside would cut my ability to move short and I wouldn’t be able to get any sort of speed up without running the risk of the legs not obeying instructions at the next step. That also puts my dignity at risk, and is terribly unattractive as an option.
However, the less you move, the harder it becomes to move. So, I had started setting a timer for 10 mins and just walking on the spot in my hotel room for 10 minutes at a time. I fold up the coverlet from the bed (which I never use, as it is far too hot) and walk on it. It cushions my steps, so I don’t get shin splints and means my downstairs neighbours don’t get disturbed.
When I was at Borders last week, I picked up a copy of the Prevention Guide, Walking Fit. It advertised walking fitness plans inside and that grabbed my attention. It was/is an absolute treasure trove of info and I was all fired up to get going after reading it.
The interval workouts seemed to be the most effective and involved walking at different speeds for different periods of time. The problem was that I had no idea how fast I was going at any time!
Then I saw an article on songs with the right beats per minute for different speeds and started toward my computer and iTunes… then something else caught my eye. Instead of listening to the same tunes all the time, someone called Podrunner had put together podcasts to fit the different walking plans; available through iTunes or their own site.
Hmmm. Went to the site, downloaded the tunes, like them very much. I quite like techno and electronic music, so these mixes are right up my street and I won’t get bored hearing the same music each time. I also don’t need to think about what order I should do things in or any other technical stuff. The music is slow, I walk slowly; the music is fast, I walk faster. Bewdy.
And if I get too hot, I’m near the airconditioning – if my legs fail, I’ve got a bed to fall onto nearby. So, I’ve got a plan and a pleasant listening experience to look forward to.
I did the first “walk” out today and it pushed me, but not too hard and I now feel like I have achieved something. It’s a 10 week programme, so we’ll see how far I get, but I’m feeling positive and (ahem) upbeat about it all!
Now, though, it’s back to work on the novel.
ttfn,
S.
Right wing red-neck rubbish.
June 26, 2009 in writing | Tags: capitalism, federal health insurance benefits, freedom of speech, pundits, right-wing commentators, socialism, un-american | 2 comments
Okay. Brace yourselves. I feel an essay coming on.
As my time in America comes to an end, I am still appalled at the contempt the conservative media commentators have for their audiences. Alan Jones has nothing on this lot, let me tell you.
Apparently, an American child is not guaranteed a secondary school education and this shows – unfortunately. The general public is so ill-informed about the world in general that they are easily swayed by the red neck rubbish that is fed to them by these bumptious idiots.
Mind you, if you dare to contradict anything they say, they pipe up with “Freedom of Speech” and label you “un-American.” It’s very sad really. Apparently the American version of freedom of speech includes never having to acknowledge another point of view or admit that you are wrong …
Firstly, let’s deal with ‘Socialism.’ The airwaves are full of rhetoric condemning this ism.
Ahem, Hear ye, Hear ye …
Socialism is the making of economic decisions based on what benefits society as a whole.
Capitalism is the making of economic decisions based on what benefits the owners of capital. Capital = Money.
Socialism does not mean communism. That is a different kettle of fish altogether. Most democratic nations are Socialist Democracies – there are no purely capitalist nations on the planet.
Are you still with me? Good.
At the moment there is a HUGE debate about the possible provision of a government run form of health insurance in the USA. The right wing are against this.
However, these are also the people who wanted unions to make concessions in the run up to the demise of GMH et al. What’s the link? I’m glad you asked, because not one of these commentators has addressed this.
In America, the large corporations include health insurance in their salary packages. This is something that started as a dodge to get around war-time caps on salaries – but that’s another issue.
The companies pay their workers’ premiums – not only while these people are working for them, but after they retire as well. If you are retired due to a disability, your company-provided health insurance remains. If you retire due to old age, the same thing happens. So companies pay HUGE amounts insuring people who no longer work for them and often the families of these people as well.
If the company goes broke, you lose your insurance. If you have stopped working due to a disability that was covered by your spouse’s insurance and you get divorced, you lose your coverage – and you can’t get covered by anyone else because you have a pre-existing condition.
This situation places an enormous strain on companies and formed a large part of the liabilities that were discussed during the debates on restructuring the motor industry. The right-wing media goons demanded that unions surrender the right to this coverage without actually explaining the wider implications of such an action to their audiences (ironically the audience tends to consist of the people who would be disadvantaged the most by these actions). They felt that it was unreasonable of the unions to try to hold onto this benefit for their former members.
However, the unions were very much aware that these retired sick and/or elderly members would not be able to afford coverage on their own and would be terribly vulnerable without it. They stuck to their guns. Yippee.
Health insurance is incredibly expensive here – often in the five figure range. Probably because it is usually paid for at the company level where monies paid can be claimed as expenses, and because there is no competition for the sector. This puts it out of the reach of most individuals.
Those people who don’t have insurance because they don’t work for a company that provides it, often don’t seek medical treatment. This means that medical conditions that can be reversed, if treated at an early stage, are instead left to continue on their natural course. So, people who may have been able to live long, healthy and productive lives, instead have their working lives cut short and their quality of life destroyed. In addition, their families are often bankrupted by the medical costs incurred while taking care of their loved ones.
This is where the socialism aspect of this issue comes in. If the government provides a form of health insurance at the federal level it will benefit American society as a whole at several levels.
Firstly, it would provide the competition that is missing in the sector and allow market forces to lower the cost of insurance across the board. (A fundamental tenet of capitalism by the way.)
Secondly, it would take a huge burden off companies, allowing them to deal with the here and now and to build their businesses – instead of taking care of superannuated former employees. That would make them more efficient participants in the capitalist system and stop them behaving as Socialist States all of their own.
Thirdly, it would mean that people would seek medical help at the earliest possible opportunity instead of waiting until it was too late to do anything about it. So, someone with gingivitis would get it treated and prevent the inevitable heart attack from happening. (Yes, gum disease causes heart attacks.) Someone with a cough from smoking might not develop full blown emphysema and someone with too much weight on their bones and a bad diet might not progress to Type 2 Diabetes and all that entails.
Similarly, their family members would not have to give up work or education opportunities to take care of them. In addition, these spouses and children would not suffer financially while they struggle to pay for the much more expensive medical treatment that their relative’s advanced condition would require.
So the benefits to society as a whole are many. The patient would remain a productive member of the workforce for a lot longer and their contribution to the capitalist system would increase the nation’s Gross Domestic Product – gotta be happy with that.
They would also be paying taxes for a lot longer, enabling the provision of better public services for their compatriots.
Their relatives would be able to work and pay taxes, or finish school and go onto higher paying jobs than they would have been able to secure otherwise.
The cost of health insurance would fall and new insurance products would become available as the insurance industry received an enormous boot up its complacent backside.
Also, hospital emergency rooms could be left to deal with true emergencies instead of the aftermath of long-ticking health time-bombs.
The only thing that would be left to happen would be requiring pundits to acknowledge that theirs isn’t the only opinion and to actually provide a factual basis for their arguments. Umm, hang on, I think the Easter Bunny is at the door …